[Bug-openmcl] Re: Bug in latest 0.14 (fwd)

[Gary Byers]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 00:18:24 -0500
From: Brian Mastenbrook <bmastenb at cs.indiana.edu>
To: Gary Byers <gb at clozure.com>
Subject: Re: Bug in latest 0.14

-------------- next part --------------
I just realized that I completely forgot to include the attachment.
Silly me.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: openmcl-bug.lisp
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1009 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://clozure.com/pipermail/bug-openmcl/attachments/20031119/131f8d85/openmcl-bug-0002.obj
-------------- next part --------------


This function also takes out LispWorks too, and triggers an error in 
ArmedBear Lisp. I'm on a roll :-)

On Nov 12, 2003, at 11:52 PM, Brian Mastenbrook wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> I seem to have encountered a bug in 0.14. The attached code, when run
> as such, encounters a very strange condition:
>
> ??(bug-function?'(1?2?3))
> Going?to?next?case...
> Required?arguments?in?#<catch-
> frame?#x478B06>?don't?match?lambda?list?(foo?bar?&rest?args).
> Going?to?next?case...
> phooey
>
> The attachment is a cleaned up version of a slightly hairy macro which
> I'm using to translate an even hairier syntax-rules macro. That macro
> fails with the following:
>
> Required arguments in #<BOGUS object @ #x478956> don't match lambda
> list (cut-id (&rest ex-ids) (&rest gs) nil (&rest xs)).
>
> I'm guessing the stack is being clobbered somewhere, which is leading
> to the fun problems.
>
> Brian
> - --
> Brian Mastenbrook
> bmastenb at cs.indiana.edu
> http://cs.indiana.edu/~bmastenb/
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP 8.0.3
>
> iQA/AwUBP7MOAWnXQDi0istxEQIXmwCgrLUUQ7OzWwJ+zFRa/RVIoFCqpBkAn3i2
> YWD2dALaj/3kKhOyUSB6mAih
> =aasI
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
--
Brian Mastenbrook
bmastenb at cs.indiana.edu
http://cs.indiana.edu/~bmastenb/