[Openmcl-devel] OpenMCL MOP Reports
gb at clozure.com
Wed Jun 25 02:02:49 EDT 2003
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Kevin Rosenberg wrote:
> I've attached a test file which illustrates a few things with the MOP.
> The first is fairly simple. The signatures of
> direct-slot-definition-class and effective-slot-definition-class does
> not match the signature in AMOP. Similarly, the signature in
> compute-effect-slot-defintion also does not match AMOP.
> The less trivial issue is that the (defclass a ...) reports:
> Illegal option :ATTRIBUTES
These bugs (and a few others that were exposed when these were fixed)
are fixed in CVS.
One of those problems indicated that there wasn't as much paranoid
bounds-checking as there could be. It'd be a good idea to do
? (compile-ccl t)
after checking out the latest changes; that'll slow a few things down
a little more, but paranoia seems wise at this point.
> Thanks for adding the MOP to OpenMCL!
Your test case worked (after the conditionalization was changed);
hopefully, it'll be possible to get at least a little farther.
> Kevin Rosenberg
> kevin at rosenberg.net
Openmcl-devel mailing list
Openmcl-devel at clozure.com
More information about the Openmcl-devel