[Openmcl-devel] Profiling Parenscript compilation
hans at huebner.org
Wed Dec 3 15:04:12 EST 2008
you can give the deterministic profiler a try. It is included with
the CCL distribution in tools/advice-profiler, but it needs to be
manually loaded. I have not looked into it in a while, but if you
find any problems with it, let me know and I'll try to help out.
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 20:56, Scott Bell <sblist at me.com> wrote:
> Hi folks,
> We have a series of Parenscript `scripts' that seem to be quite
> expensive to
> compile under most Lisps. SBCL takes between 8 and 12 seconds, and CCL
> takes up to 90 seconds.
> In my attempts to locate the most expensive calls, I have used CHUD-
> Apple's Instruments profiler, and out-of-the-box Shark. Since these do
> seem to be able to profile Lisp functions, I'm at a bit of a loss on
> how to proceed.
> Does anyone have any advice?
> - Scott Bell
> Openmcl-devel mailing list
> Openmcl-devel at clozure.com
More information about the Openmcl-devel