[Openmcl-devel] Profiling Parenscript compilation
gb at clozure.com
Wed Dec 3 15:06:26 EST 2008
On Wed, 3 Dec 2008, Scott Bell wrote:
> Hi folks,
> We have a series of Parenscript `scripts' that seem to be quite
> expensive to
> compile under most Lisps. SBCL takes between 8 and 12 seconds, and CCL
> takes up to 90 seconds.
> In my attempts to locate the most expensive calls, I have used CHUD-
> Apple's Instruments profiler, and out-of-the-box Shark. Since these do
> seem to be able to profile Lisp functions, I'm at a bit of a loss on
> how to proceed.
> Does anyone have any advice?
Use CHUD 4.5.0, and read ccl/library/chud-profiling.txt ?
CHUD 4.5.0 matches what was released with XCode 3.0. Later versions seem
to break support for using ".spatch" files to name otherwise anonymous
memory regions (like lisp functions.)
> - Scott Bell
> Openmcl-devel mailing list
> Openmcl-devel at clozure.com
More information about the Openmcl-devel