[Openmcl-devel] Anyone using ch-image?
ron at awun.net
Fri Jan 11 01:07:37 EST 2008
Thanks. It appears I have more basic problems. I tried loading ch-
image using sbcl and it turns out that my libtiff is left over from my
PPC days. Trick is, I have no idea where it came from. It's in /opt/
local/lib so it seems to be a darwinport, but there doesn't actually
seem to be a darwinport of libtiff. Grrrr....
I hate computers.
On Jan 10, 2008, at 4:54 PM, Cyrus Harmon wrote:
> Also, I imagine it wouldn't be too hard to rework tiff-ffi to use
> verazzano and cffi instead of gcc-xml-ffi and sb-alien (or to write
> that CFFI backend to gcc-xml-ffi).
> On Jan 10, 2008, at 4:46 PM, Cyrus Harmon wrote:
>> You should be able to load ch-image without tiff-ffi, but perhaps the
>> safe-load hack I wrote is busted. Making ch-image work with openmcl
>> (somewhere) on the list of things to do, but I haven't gotten around
>> to it. My guess is that performance will be much better in SBCL, but,
>> still, it would be nice if it worked with openmcl.
>> On a related note, is there a non-ffi TIFF library around?
>> On Jan 10, 2008, at 3:03 PM, Ron Garret wrote:
>>> Has anyone successfully loaded ch-image (or any other image
>>> library) into CCL? I'm running into a slew of SBCL-dependencies
>>> related to the tiff-ffi library (which ch-image seems to rely on).
>>> Openmcl-devel mailing list
>>> Openmcl-devel at clozure.com
>> Openmcl-devel mailing list
>> Openmcl-devel at clozure.com
More information about the Openmcl-devel