[Openmcl-devel] Who uses CL+SSL and CCL?
john at mcaleely.com
Sat Jan 17 09:50:59 EST 2009
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, John McAleely wrote:
>> I could well imagine other implementations where this hasn't been
>> exposed as a problem. Is it possible that a recent change in CCL has
>> surfaced this bug in the CL+SSL test code?
> I have more difficulty imagining that. I don't know of any CCL
> change that would have affected whether or not this really worked.
OK fair enough. I suppose I imagined that other environments were more
aggressive in sending output, so that the two close calls have very
little effect on the output. As you observe, that seems unlikely.
Andrew: I've reported the issue on the cl+ssl mailing list.
Thanks for your help,
More information about the Openmcl-devel