[Openmcl-devel] (SETF FIND-CLASS)
Leslie P. Polzer
sky at viridian-project.de
Tue May 5 09:08:14 EDT 2009
Thanks everyone for your explanations.
I do believe that CCL's behaviour is correct now.
Some more comments:
> All well and good, but it seems that many (most ?
> all ?) other implementations unconditionally define S to be a type-specifier
> whenever C is a class,
SBCL and ECL map all class names to types while CLISP only maps
the proper name to a type.
> As noted in the earlier message, CCL's behavior would be more consistent
> if DEFTYPE also checked for proper-namedness (or the equivalent).
Yes, indeed. I will try to enhance DEFTYPE's behavior in CCL.
What do you mean by "or the equivalent"?
More information about the Openmcl-devel