[Openmcl-devel] Selecting a Lisp to run in SLIME creates ugliness in Emacs menus
dwiniecki at boisestate.edu
Mon Feb 8 16:35:18 UTC 2010
Thanks for the info and the redirect.
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Stas Boukarev <stassats at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Donald Winiecki
> <dwiniecki at boisestate.edu> wrote:
> > A few weeks ago you all helped me get CCL up and running inside SLIME on
> > Ubuntu 9.10 system. Almost immediately I noticed something visually
> > inside Emacs, but in the interest of getting some real work done I have
> > trying to ignore it.
> > Now that some real work *has* been done, I'm allowing the aforementioned
> > weirdness to bother me more and more.
> > What I have done is inserted relevant code into my .emacs file so I can
> > select either CCL or SBCL to run inside SLIME.
> > The weirdness is that regardless which (CCL or SBCL) is selected to run
> > inside SLIME, once everything is running, all SLIME specific menus in
> > have all of their menu items duplicated -- each is listed twice in the
> > of the menu.
> > Is this normal -- at which point I'd treat it like an ugly dog that you
> > anyway -- or not?
> > Here is the code in my .emacs file that `makes it all possible':
> > ;; The following allows one to decide which lisp to load
> > ;; M-- M-x slime <-- entered at the minibuffer in Emacs
> > (setq slime-lisp-implementations
> > '((ccl ("/home/dwiniecki/ccl/scripts/ccl"))
> > (sbcl ("/usr/bin/sbcl"
> > "--core" "/usr/lib/sbcl/sbcl.core")
> > :coding-system utf-8-unix)))
> Update your slime (from CVS), this bug was fixed a week ago.
> P.S. You posted to the wrong mailing list, slime-devel at common-lisp.net
> is for Slime.
> With best regards, Stas.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Openmcl-devel